Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes

From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <ads(at)pgug(dot)de>
To: damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>
Cc: pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes
Date: 2008-01-14 14:18:18
Message-ID: 20080114141818.GV31998@base.wars-nicht.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:44:15PM +0100, damien clochard wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2008 13:32:31 Koen Martens wrote:
> >
> > Ah, yes, a retry within 30 days. Is this practical? I mean, it being a
> > european organisation, it is safe to assume people who will attend the GA
> > will have to make plans in advance. Meaning that if you schedule another
> > one within 30 days, it is likely a lot of the attendees will not be able to
> > come (budget, no holiday left, etc..). I think it is nearly impossible to
> > have 30% present, so that would mean two GA's within 30 days almost by
> > default. It should probably be considered if this is indeed what we would
> > want..
> 
> Actually the quorum is 30% of members present **or represented**. Someone that 
> can't travel to the meeting may give his voice to a member that will be 
> physically present. The statutes also allows voting by e-mail.

In addition we can have meetings on IRC. So it seems reasonable that we
invite for a meeting which virtually everyone could attend who just has
the time. No traveling, no additional costs, most ppl can even continue
your normal work.

In the case we don't reach a quorum by mail/irc/whatever, we have 
another meeting between 6-30 days which goes without quorum.

In an associations you really want quorum decisions, this makes sense.
If not, you don't need an association at all, you can go which 2, 3 
people making decisions, you don't need elections, ah, you don't need a 
group at all.
The "no quorom" is only a fallback to make sure that the group is 
capable of acting even if the majority of the members does not respond.


> > Now, a simple solution would be to drop the quorum. This is not uncommon.
> > An objection to dropping the quorum could be democratic validity, but as
> > said I think in practice you will always end up with a non-quorumed GA
> > within 30 days anyway, so democractic calidity is not an argument.

If the majority does not respond you end up with a second meeting, yes.
But that's not a reason to drop the quorum. Anyway, for important topics 
and some time for preparation/schedule people usually attend meetings.


> There's another quorum of 50% when the General Assembly has to discuss  about 
> dissolving the association. Do you want to drop that quorum too ?

;-)
If we drop the first one, why not all?


> > Sorry to be nitpicking, but that's what writing statutes is about :) Assume
> > the worst, and try to make rules that prevent that.

You don't prevent anything if you drop all the rules.


Kind regards

-- 
				Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group

In response to

pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Koen MartensDate: 2008-01-14 14:24:16
Subject: Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europeassociation statutes
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-01-14 13:49:10
Subject: Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group