Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)
Date: 2008-01-10 16:03:04
Message-ID: 20080110160304.GH10183@svr2.hagander.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:29:53AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> 
> >>I don't think of a good idea. However, since our document has announced 
> >>officially, saying >=VC7.1. Therefore, I think that it is satisfactory.
> >
> >Ah, good point, I forgot about that.
> >
> >But - if we do that, why do we need that IF check *at all*?
> 
> It is because it is saved by it although VC6 is private. probably, present 
> all will be possible by it. I feel that it is better than exclusion for it.

Ok. Applied.

//Magnus

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-10 19:08:06
Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-10 15:57:34
Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group