On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:29:53AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> >>I don't think of a good idea. However, since our document has announced
> >>officially, saying >=VC7.1. Therefore, I think that it is satisfactory.
> >Ah, good point, I forgot about that.
> >But - if we do that, why do we need that IF check *at all*?
> It is because it is saved by it although VC6 is private. probably, present
> all will be possible by it. I feel that it is better than exclusion for it.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-01-10 19:08:06|
|Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-01-10 15:57:34|
|Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior|