On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:15:53AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> >>Condition understanding of '>=' is not made as for namke of VC6 to a
> >>regrettable thing, but it causes an error to it....:-(
> >>So, except all thought that it was good.
> >Hmm. Crap.
> >Perhaps there's something else we can check on? Like a feature or
> >environment variable only present in newer versions or something?
> I don't think of a good idea. However, since our document has announced
> officially, saying >=VC7.1. Therefore, I think that it is satisfactory.
Ah, good point, I forgot about that.
But - if we do that, why do we need that IF check *at all*?
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-01-10 15:28:03|
|Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior|
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Saito||Date: 2008-01-10 15:15:53|
|Subject: Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)|