On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 10:26:54PM +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> 
> I'm still puzzled about how a DBA is expected to figure out which 
> segments to mark. 

I think that part might be hand-wavy still.  But once this facility is
there, what's to prevent the current active segment (and the rest) from also
getting this mark, which would mean "the table is read only"?  

A

In response to

• Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps at 2008-01-04 21:26:54 from Markus Schiltknecht

Responses

• Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps at 2008-01-05 10:13:12 from Markus Schiltknecht

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2008-01-04 22:01:31
	Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Previous:	From: Markus Schiltknecht	Date: 2008-01-04 21:26:54
	Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps