Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Date: 2008-01-04 21:40:45
Message-ID: 20080104214045.GF821@crankycanuck.ca (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 10:26:54PM +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> 
> I'm still puzzled about how a DBA is expected to figure out which 
> segments to mark. 

I think that part might be hand-wavy still.  But once this facility is
there, what's to prevent the current active segment (and the rest) from also
getting this mark, which would mean "the table is read only"?  

A


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-04 22:01:31
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Previous:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2008-01-04 21:26:54
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group