Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Date: 2008-01-04 20:08:07
Message-ID: 20080104200807.GX821@crankycanuck.ca (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:37:03PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The problem with adding SSL to local sockets is this slippery slope
> where we only do part of the job, but it isn't clear where to draw the
> line.

I don't think "part of the job" for a patch is a slippery slope.  It's what
you do with patches for issues discovered too late to make full release:
pick the least invasive thing you can do, release that patch, and implement
the full feature later.

A


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2008-01-04 21:26:54
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-04 19:38:24
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-01-04 22:16:53
Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in8.3beta4
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-01-04 19:37:03
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group