Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Using the attached patch, SSL will act over Unix-domain sockets.  AFAICT, this 
> just works.  I didn't find a way to sniff a Unix-domain socket, however.
> 
> How should we proceed with this?

I am confused by the shortness of this patch.  Right now pg_hba.conf
has:

	# host       DATABASE  USER  CIDR-ADDRESS  METHOD  [OPTION]
	# hostssl    DATABASE  USER  CIDR-ADDRESS  METHOD  [OPTION]
	# hostnossl  DATABASE  USER  CIDR-ADDRESS  METHOD  [OPTION]

These are all for TCP connections.  How do we handle 'local' SSL
connection specification?  Do we want to provide similar functionality
for local connections?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

• SSL over Unix-domain sockets at 2008-01-04 16:13:21 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

• Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets at 2008-01-04 17:35:02 from Peter Eisentraut
• Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets at 2008-01-05 13:13:46 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2008-01-04 17:35:02
	Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous:	From: Martijn van Oosterhout	Date: 2008-01-04 16:36:54
	Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2008-01-04 17:35:02
	Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous:	From: Martijn van Oosterhout	Date: 2008-01-04 16:36:54
	Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets