Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: 2006-06-27 15:30:56
Message-ID: 20080.1151422256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> send() may take as long as 200ms. So, I think we should increase
> SO_SNDBUF to more than 8192. I attache the patch.

Why would that help? We won't be sending more than 8K at a time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-27 15:31:20 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2006-06-27 15:23:13 SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-27 15:31:20 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2006-06-27 15:23:13 SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?