Re: SGML docs can't be built as .PDF ...

I can confirm your exact behavior on my machine and I am researching
group levels too. I haven't come up with any fix yet either.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> I've confirmed recent reports of trouble building PDF output from our
> CVS HEAD SGML. Using Fedora 8 openjade (plus slow-lists patch),
> with the TeX parameter size increases recommended in our docs, it dies
> here:
>
> LaTeX Warning: Reference `PGCRYPTO-WITH-WITHOUT-OPENSSL' on page xlvii undefine
> d on input line 55630.
>
>
> LaTeX Warning: Reference `101017' on page xlvii undefined on input line 55655.
>
> ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [grouping levels=255].
> \rlap #1->\hb(at)xt@ \z@
> {#1\hss }
> l.55663 {start}}
> \Link%
> ! ==> Fatal error occurred, the output PDF file is not finished!
>
> There does not seem to be any parameter controlling "grouping levels",
> but in any case it seems that this is not so much TeX's problem as a bug
> in the TeX code emitted by openjade. The failure is occurring in the
> list-of-tables (presumably at the 255'th table, though I didn't count),
> and at the end of the list of tables I find
>
> {\def\Label%
> {PL-LANGUAGE-TABLE}}\endNode{}\endSeq{}\endLink{}\endPar{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\end!
> Seq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\e!
> ndSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}
> \endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSeq{}\endSpS{}\Node%
> {\def\Element%
>
> All those \endSeq{}'s correspond to unclosed \Seq macros in the code for
> each list-of-tables entry. So this looks to me like a stylesheet bug,
> but I don't know the DSSSL stuff well enough to know where to look.
> Anyone want to tackle it?
>
> (A workaround might be to suppress the list-of-tables in PDF output,
> but I dunno how to do that either.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +