Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
Date: 2007-12-27 13:20:03
Message-ID: 20071227132002.GC5709@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Tom Lane escribió:

> Currently the docs say that --enable-cassert
> 
>          Enables <firstterm>assertion</> checks in the server, which test for
>          many <quote>cannot happen</> conditions.  This is invaluable for
>          code development purposes, but the tests slow things down a little.
> 
> Maybe we ought to put that more strongly --- s/a little/significantly/,
> perhaps?

I don't think it will make any difference, because people don't read
configure documentation.  They read configure --help.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bill MoranDate: 2007-12-27 13:50:09
Subject: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-12-27 13:14:25
Subject: Re: pg_dump performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group