In response to Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>:
> >> Bill Moran wrote:
> >>> I'm fairly sure that FreeBSD's GEOM does. Of course, it couldn't be doing
> >>> consistency checking at that point.
> >> According to this:
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=gmirror&apropos=0&sektion=8&manpath=FreeBSD+6-current&format=html
> >> There is a -b (balance) option that seems pretty clear that it does not
> >> read from all drives if it does not have to:
> > >From where did you draw that conclusion? Note that the "split" algorithm
> > (which is the default) divides requests up among multiple drives. I'm
> > unclear as to how you reached a conclusion opposite of what the man page
> > says -- did you test and find it not to work?
> Perhaps you and I are speaking slightly different languages? :-) When I
> say "does not read from all drives", I mean "it will happily read from
> any of the drives to satisfy the request, and allows some level of
> configuration as to which drive it will select. It does not need to read
> all of the drives to satisfy the request."
Ahh ... I did misunderstand you.
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-12-27 18:54:28|
|Subject: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances |
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-12-27 16:50:46|
|Subject: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances|