Re: Proposed patch to disallow password=foo in database name parameter

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch to disallow password=foo in database name parameter
Date: 2007-12-24 20:50:37
Message-ID: 20071224205037.GP91207@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:58:05AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >I'm actually inclined to vote with Stephen that this is a silly change.
> >I just put up the patch to show the best way of doing it if we're gonna
> >do it ...
>
> OK. I'm not going to die in a ditch over it.

On the other hand, warning about it in the docs would probably be a good
idea...
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2007-12-25 18:04:38 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Null Bitmap Optimization(for TrailingNULLs)
Previous Message Dhanaraj M 2007-12-22 04:58:38 Re: Doc-patch: PAM authentication fails for local UNIX users