Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
Date: 2007-12-22 12:21:51
Message-ID: 200712221221.lBMCLpT17535@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:

	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:31:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 
> > Well, I wouldn't advocate making it in a minor release, but it's not
> > clear how that translates into saying it can't go into 8.3.
> 
> Just because we're well past feature freeze, in beta.  I realise this seems
> like a corner case, but the whole point of having betas where functionality
> is more or less frozen is to reduce the liklihood that someone's testing on
> (say) beta 2 is not all completely invalidated on beta 4.
> 
> A
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
> 
>                 http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-12-22 13:15:26
Subject: Re: Sorting Improvements for 8.4
Previous:From: FranciscoDate: 2007-12-22 07:07:28
Subject: binary decode

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group