From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New style of hash join proposal |
Date: | 2007-12-22 02:50:08 |
Message-ID: | 200712220250.lBM2o8Y07366@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Decibel! wrote:
> > I fear the real complexity would be (as always) in the planner
> > rather than the
> > executor. I haven't really looked into what it would take to
> > arrange this or
> > how to decide when to do it.
>
> TODO?
This email was added to the 8.4 queue:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
Once we are in 8.4 development we can decide if we are going to
implement it or add it to the TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2007-12-22 03:42:23 | timetz range check issue |
Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2007-12-22 00:28:12 | Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code) |