Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't know how to make it output the symbol names like it seems to do
> for you.
> Having the typedef list in the script itself seems like a barrier for
> other people to contribute to this thing. I wonder if that can be
> changed so that the typedef is on a separate list.
Done and committed.
> (Why are we still distributing pgjindent anyway?)
> I am also wondering if current GNU indent is now better suited to the
> task. Perhaps the bugs that it had on earlier versions have since been
> fixed? I remember checking the source code size a couple of years ago
> and it had grown by an order of magnitude or something like that.
Yes, we should give that another try. I will keep this as an 8.4 item.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-12-21 14:29:04|
|Subject: Re: pgindent issue with EXEC_BACKEND-only typedefs|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2007-12-21 14:13:32|
|Subject: Re: function body actors (was: viewing source code)|