On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:41:56PM +0530, Dhanaraj M wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is the continuation to the discussion that we had in the hacker's
> Here, I like to add some details in 20.2.6. PAM authentication section.
> Can someone review and make changes, if required? Thanks.
Eh, those extensions are only valid if you use PAM with a shadow password
file, no? You shouldn't need root if you use say PAM-with-LDAP?
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2007-12-19 13:13:09|
|Subject: Re: Doc-patch: PAM authentication fails for local UNIX
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-12-19 12:30:24|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] buildenv.pl/buildenv.bat|