| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint" |
| Date: | 2007-12-13 17:49:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200712130949.06970.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Greg, All:
> The other problem was that the original description over-sold the feature
> a bit. It said "prevent I/O spikes" when it actually just reduces them.
> Still possible to have a spike, it probably won't be as big though. Your
> call on whether correcting that mischaracterization is worth bothering the
> translators over.
Sounds like I'd better. Sending out this afternoon.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-12-13 21:49:47 | Re: Dangerous hint in the PostgreSQL manual |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-13 17:34:52 | Re: [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-13 19:12:26 | Re: Slow PITR restore |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-13 17:34:52 | Re: [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint" |