Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Date: 2007-12-13 17:49:06
Message-ID: 200712130949.06970.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Greg, All:

> The other problem was that the original description over-sold the feature
> a bit.  It said "prevent I/O spikes" when it actually just reduces them.
> Still possible to have a spike, it probably won't be as big though.  Your
> call on whether correcting that mischaracterization is worth bothering the
> translators over.

Sounds like I'd better.  Sending out this afternoon.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2007-12-13 21:49:47
Subject: Re: Dangerous hint in the PostgreSQL manual
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-12-13 17:34:52
Subject: Re: [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-12-13 19:12:26
Subject: Re: Slow PITR restore
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-12-13 17:34:52
Subject: Re: [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group