On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:34:05PM +0530, NikhilS wrote:
> Another reason to go along with triggers is that "COPY" honors
> triggers, but does not honor rules. While trying to do bulk inserts
> into a parent of partitioned tables where rules are being employed,
> the COPY operation will not be so straightforward.
Does my latest patch attached address this well enough?
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: rihad||Date: 2007-12-01 08:02:23|
|Subject: full_page_writes = off?|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-11-30 09:54:19|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2007-12-01 10:43:52|
|Subject: plpgsql, forc statement|
|Previous:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2007-12-01 00:54:06|
|Subject: pt_BR FAQ update|