| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
| Date: | 2007-11-28 20:57:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20071128205710.GL24146@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:53:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > Best practices for partitioning so far have shown that TRIGGERs
> > are better than RULEs for most cases. Please find attached a
> > patch which reflects this.
>
> Entirely removing the example of how to do it with rules doesn't
> seem like a good idea.
It does to me. I haven't found a case yet where rules worked even as
well as triggers.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-28 20:57:28 | Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-28 20:53:04 | Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-28 21:03:42 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-28 20:53:04 | Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules |