Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: 2007-11-28 20:57:10
Message-ID: 20071128205710.GL24146@fetter.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:53:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > Best practices for partitioning so far have shown that TRIGGERs
> > are better than RULEs for most cases.  Please find attached a
> > patch which reflects this.
> 
> Entirely removing the example of how to do it with rules doesn't
> seem like a good idea.

It does to me.  I haven't found a case yet where rules worked even as
well as triggers.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-11-28 20:57:28
Subject: Re: Two fixes for plpgsql.sgml
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-11-28 20:53:04
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-11-28 21:03:42
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-11-28 20:53:04
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group