| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Matt Magoffin" <postgresql(dot)org(at)msqr(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] possible to create multivalued index from xpath() results in 8.3? |
| Date: | 2007-11-26 12:53:41 |
| Message-ID: | 200711261353.41889.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Am Freitag, 23. November 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Should we force initdb to correct these pg_proc entries, or just quietly
> >> change pg_proc.h?
> >
> > Considering the extent of the changes, I'd be in favor of forcing an
> > initdb.
>
> Well, if you're going to change the contents of pg_cast then there is
> little choice. I was considering something less invasive ...
I will hang on to this patch for a few more days to see if any invasive
catalog changes come out of the quote_literal/set_config discussion. If not,
I'll consider a less invasive solution.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Larsen | 2007-11-26 13:25:04 | Re: replication in Postgres |
| Previous Message | Andrus | 2007-11-26 11:29:50 | Re: Why LIMIT and OFFSET are commutative |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mac_man2005 | 2007-11-26 13:24:40 | Re: Replacement Selection |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-11-26 12:35:42 | Re: Replacement Selection |