Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: dell versus hp

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
Date: 2007-11-14 22:39:50
Message-ID: 200711141439.50418@hal.medialogik.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> 
wrote:
> > OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10
> > performance, but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try
> > an Areca controller in next storage server.
>
> I believe these were both on ext3.  I thought I had some XFS results
> available for comparison, but I couldn't find them.

Yeah I've seen ext3 write performance issues on RAID-10. XFS is much better.

-- 
Q: Why did God create economists?
A: In order to make weather forecasters look good.


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-11-14 22:46:24
Subject: Re: Curious about dead rows.
Previous:From: Jeff FrostDate: 2007-11-14 22:36:54
Subject: Re: dell versus hp

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group