Re: dell versus hp

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
Date: 2007-11-14 22:39:50
Message-ID: 200711141439.50418@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
wrote:
> > OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10
> > performance, but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try
> > an Areca controller in next storage server.
>
> I believe these were both on ext3. I thought I had some XFS results
> available for comparison, but I couldn't find them.

Yeah I've seen ext3 write performance issues on RAID-10. XFS is much better.

--
Q: Why did God create economists?
A: In order to make weather forecasters look good.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-14 22:46:24 Re: Curious about dead rows.
Previous Message Jeff Frost 2007-11-14 22:36:54 Re: dell versus hp