Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Date: 2007-11-14 14:08:33
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
> Thoughts?

I looked at the release note mention of gborg and they are generic URLs
meaning they don't point to specific projects, I think we should just
leave them alone (as Marc suggested).

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Leif B. KristensenDate: 2007-11-14 14:24:24
Subject: Re: Avoiding upgrade backlash
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-11-14 13:42:08
Subject: Re: Avoiding upgrade backlash

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group