Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Date: 2007-11-14 03:17:04
Message-ID: 20071113191704.79e0bfb0@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:02:06 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
>
> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
> Thoughts?

There are some references in the main docs too last I checked. I can
submit a patch in the next day.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your
> friend
>

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHOmiwATb/zqfZUUQRApuMAKCdPuaEHNgpxeMPtunkjfTP5h0x7ACgpGoe
z4N2DouGfeDDbNQ8LMsAxKw=
=zUqf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-14 03:28:11 Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-14 02:02:06 Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation