Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
> >> conversion?
> > I see dblink:
> > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html
> Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are
> still there.
Because I thought only READMEs were converted. Removed now.
> > I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage.
> The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files?
My guess is they were not converted because they are READMEs that
related to the examples. We can convert them if people want.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Albert Cervera i Areny||Date: 2007-11-11 13:05:19|
|Subject: Re: Contrib docs v1|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-11-11 04:48:59|
|Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation |