Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Date: 2007-11-11 05:14:59
Message-ID: 200711110514.lAB5ExN19424@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
> >> conversion?
> 
> > I see dblink:
> > 	http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html
> 
> Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are
> still there.

Because I thought only READMEs were converted.  Removed now.

> > I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage.
> 
> The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files?

My guess is they were not converted because they are READMEs that
related to the examples.  We can convert them if people want.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Albert Cervera i ArenyDate: 2007-11-11 13:05:19
Subject: Re: Contrib docs v1
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-11-11 04:48:59
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group