Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench
Date: 2007-11-05 16:36:21
Message-ID: 200711051636.lA5GaLG06414@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches


This has been saved for the 8.4 release:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > > All of filler fields in branches, tellers and history is NULL. It is
> > > probabbly a mistake because there are fields of char(22-88) in the table
> > > definitions.
> > > TPC-B requires at least 100 bytes per row for all tables used in it.
> >
> > I'm not in favor of changing this. pgbench has never pretended to be
> > "really" TPC-B, nor has anyone ever tried to compare its numbers against
> > other TPC-B numbers. On the other hand, people *do* compare pgbench
> > numbers to itself over time, and if we make a change like this it will
> > break comparability of the results.
>
> Ok, I feel it reasonable.
> The attached is a patch to mention it in the source code.
>
> Regards,
> ---
> ITAGAKI Takahiro
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-11-05 18:04:49 Re: Possible planner bug/regression introduced in 8.2.5
Previous Message M. Palm 2007-11-05 16:19:01 BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-05 17:08:48 Re: pg_ctl configurable timeout
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-05 16:33:42 Re: Configurable Penalty Costs for Levenshtein