Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux
Date: 2007-10-26 22:01:54
Message-ID: 20071026220154.GF8655@crankycanuck.ca (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:34:49AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> we only check for the case once per checkpoint and we don't create a
> segment unless there's very little space left.

Sort of a filthy hack, but what about always having an _extra_
segment around?  The bgwriter could do that, no?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-26 22:47:35
Subject: Re: WAL archiving idle database
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-10-26 21:49:58
Subject: Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group