Re: module archive

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: module archive
Date: 2007-10-26 09:48:23
Message-ID: 20071026094823.GA24394@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:31:30PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> From time to time people have raised the idea of a CPAN-like mechanism
> for downloading, building and installing extensions and the like (types,
> functions, sample dbs, anything not requiring Postgres itself to be
> rebuilt), and I have been thinking on this for the last few days. What
> sort of requirements would people have of such a mechanism? How do
> people envision it working?

There's been some discussion before:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/msg00327.php

The most useful feature IMHO would be if the installed modules could be
recognised as a block (using pg_depends) so that:

1. pg_dump can see them and emit only INSTALL <module>
2. Uninstall removes everything that was installed

This only covers installtion though, not building or compiling.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2007-10-26 09:48:50 Re: [HACKERS] Including Snapshot Info with Indexes
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-10-26 09:32:09 Re: Autovacuum cancellation