Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
Date: 2007-10-15 21:54:12
Message-ID: 200710152254130000@3036129777 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> To: "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>
> Sent: 15/10/07, 21:19:04
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
> 
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 10:42 -0500, Roberts, Jon wrote:
> 
> > Like I said in the email, I think the best solution is to put the code in a
> > function.  However, after I inserted a total of 25 jobs, the difference is
> > more noticeable and my sql is better in terms of cost and total time.
> 
> You're missing a few key points:
> 
> - this isn't the PgAdmin hackers list, so you're asking in the wrong
> place ... go to www.pgadmin.org and go from there. This is the standard
> PostgreSQL bug list and you haven't shown any bug with standard
> PostgreSQL.
> 
> - PgAdmin 1.8 is almost released so you may have missed the boat 
> 
> - pgAdmin is trying to work with other PG variants, so a reasoned
> argument, in the right place, may help.

A change has been applied for GP compatibility. It will be in pgAdmin 1.8.

Regards, Dave

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2007-10-15 22:11:37
Subject: Re: Deferred FK / PK deletion problems
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-10-15 20:24:06
Subject: Re: BUG #3674: Unnecessary checkpoints by WAL Writer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group