Am Freitag, 12. Oktober 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Sorry, you don't get to put JOHAB back into the portion of the list that
> is backend-legal encodings.
> It's a bit nasty that this enum is exposed as part of the ABI, but I'm
> afraid we may be stuck with that decision.
Perhaps we should leave a gap where JOHAB used to be and add it at the end.
Otherwise we may have to do a soname exercise.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-10-12 16:54:27|
|Subject: Re: libpq5 8.3 breaks 8.2 compatibility with encodings |
|Previous:||From: Martin Pitt||Date: 2007-10-12 16:18:45|
|Subject: Re: libpq5 8.3 breaks 8.2 compatibility with encodings|