Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
Date: 2007-10-09 02:58:46
Message-ID: 200710090258.l992wk802285@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> > It's a compromise, a single step of a slow migration (which I still
> > see as the only reasonable option).
>
> That assumes that there is somewhere to migrate to. But there isn't.
> The renaming has been rejected.

Amazing how you came to that conclusion, and I will not reargue that
point here.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-10-09 07:44:21 Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-10-09 01:28:48 Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster"