| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL |
| Date: | 2007-10-04 20:24:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20071004202443.GD28896@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> This is making me think that we should just embed the session pool
> inside the server as well and have done with it.
You mean prefork? That would be neat. I don't think it's all that
impossible.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-04 20:27:06 | Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-10-04 20:14:51 | Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-04 20:27:06 | Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-10-04 20:14:51 | Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL |