Re: quickly getting the top N rows

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
To: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: quickly getting the top N rows
Date: 2007-10-04 18:14:11
Message-ID: 20071004141411.9509fe66.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

In response to Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>:

> If I have this:
>
> create table foo (bar int primary key);
>
> ...then in my ideal world, Postgres would be able to use that index on bar
> to help me with this:
>
> select bar from foo order by bar desc limit 20;
>
> But in my experience, PG8.2 is doing a full table scan on foo, then
> sorting it, then doing the limit. I have a more complex primary key, but I
> was hoping the same concept would still apply. Am I doing something wrong,
> or just expecting something that doesn't exist?

Show us the explain.

However, 2 guesses:
1) You never analyzed the table, thus PG has awful statistics and
doesn't know how to pick a good plan.
2) You have so few rows in the table that a seq scan is actually
faster than an index scan, which is why PG uses it instead.

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2007-10-04 18:22:42 Re: quickly getting the top N rows
Previous Message Mark Lewis 2007-10-04 18:10:24 Re: quickly getting the top N rows