On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Jeff Frost wrote:
> I expected these numbers to be in sync, but was suprised to see that the
> sequence skips a values after every generate series.
>
> CREATE TABLE jefftest ( id serial, num int );
> INSERT INTO jefftest (num) values (generate_series(1,10));
> INSERT INTO jefftest (num) values (generate_series(11,20));
> INSERT INTO jefftest (num) values (generate_series(21,30));
It seems to do what you'd expect if you do
INSERT INTO jefftest(num) select a from generate_series(1,10) as foo(a);
INSERT INTO jefftest(num) select a from generate_series(11,20) as foo(a);
INSERT INTO jefftest(num) select a from generate_series(21,30) as foo(a);
I tried a function that raises a notice and called it as
select f1(1), generate_series(1,10);
and got 11 notices so it looks like there's some kind of phantom involved.
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Ron Mayer | Date: 2007-10-04 01:37:18 |
| Subject: Re: Use of "postmaster" |
| Previous: | From: Brendan Jurd | Date: 2007-10-03 23:54:12 |
| Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster" |
pgsql-sql by date
| Next: | From: Tena Sakai | Date: 2007-10-04 02:25:04 |
| Subject: Re: field separator problem |
| Previous: | From: Michael Fuhr | Date: 2007-10-04 00:54:10 |
| Subject: Re: field separator problem |