Re: Loose check was corrected of win32.mak.

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Loose check was corrected of win32.mak.
Date: 2007-10-02 08:49:38
Message-ID: 20071002084938.GC14143@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:20:16PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi Magnus.
>
> Loose check was corrected...
> and, It notifies an intelligible error message.

+ !MESSAGE nmake ended....
+ !ERROR Make aorted.

Apart from the spelling error on the second line, do we need the first line
at all? It kind of says the same thing, but does nmake require a fixed
number of rows or so? If not, I'll just take that away before committing.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-10-02 08:58:54 Re: ecpg thread-safe descriptor
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2007-10-02 08:35:21 Re: [HACKERS] Function structure in formatting.c