Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html
> 
> Not a whole lot of technical content there, but pretty interesting
> nonetheless.  I *think* that the issues we're seeing are largely in the
> NFS client-side kernel code, so bypassing that stack as Oracle is doing
> might eliminate the problem.  Of course, there's a sizable amount of
> code to be written to do that ...

Yeah.  Next step we will be writing our own malloc.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

• Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea at 2007-10-01 23:25:16 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea at 2007-10-08 20:46:26 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-novice by date

Next:	From: sandy_mcd@juno.com	Date: 2007-10-02 03:31:29
	Subject: how to edit entries in vendor supplied database?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-01 23:25:16
	Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

pgsql-docs by date

Next:	From: Brendan Jurd	Date: 2007-10-03 22:27:50
	Subject: Use of "postmaster"
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-01 23:25:16
	Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-01 23:48:27
	Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2007-10-01 23:43:45
	Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher