Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> >> There may be some other safeguards in place I did not see to prevent this,
> >> but I don't see a reason why we shouldn't use unsigned int or
> >> unsigned long int here, both for ntups and the return value of the
> >> function.
> > On second thought, I have at least updated the function documentation:
> > Returns the number of rows (tuples) in the query result. Because
> > it returns an integer result, large result sets might overflow the
> > return value on 32-bit operating systems.
> This is silly. Have you forgotten that the max number of columns is
> constrained to 1600 on the backend side?
Uh, this is the number of returned rows, right? How does this relate to
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Erik Jones||Date: 2007-09-26 22:22:40|
|Subject: Re: datestyle question|
|Previous:||From: Keaton Adams||Date: 2007-09-26 20:44:52|
|Subject: Memory usage of COPY command|