| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Harrison <joshques(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: rules and command status question |
| Date: | 2007-09-25 13:53:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20070925135306.GD6440@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Josh Harrison escribió:
> Hello,
> I have a question in the postgres document chapter 34. Rules and Command
> Status.
> The last paragraph of that page says that
>
> "The programmer can ensure that any desired INSTEAD rule is the one that
> sets the command status in the second case, by giving it the alphabetically
> last rule name among the active rules, so that it gets applied last."
>
> Can someone help me understand what this means. How can I change my INSERT
> ...INSTEAD rule so that query returns the number of rows inserted ( instead
> of 0 rows inserted).
You can't.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Siebert | 2007-09-25 14:00:06 | Porblems migrating a server. |
| Previous Message | Brad Nicholson | 2007-09-25 13:40:01 | Re: lowering impact of checkpoints |