Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: curious regression failures

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: curious regression failures
Date: 2007-09-21 01:13:22
Message-ID: 20070921011321.GO30013@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:

> There might be another way to manage this, but we're not inventing
> a new invalidation mechanism for 8.3.  This patch will have to be
> reverted for the time being :-(

Thanks.  Seems it was a good judgement call to apply it only to HEAD,
after all.

In any case, at that point we are mostly done with the expensive steps
of vacuuming, so the transaction finishes not long after this.  I don't
think this issue is worth inventing a new invalidation mechanism.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                  http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
"La victoria es para quien se atreve a estar solo"

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: ஆமாச்சுDate: 2007-09-21 01:15:24
Subject: Beginning Tamil Community for Postgre
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-09-21 00:34:32
Subject: Re: stored procedure stats in collector

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-09-21 01:18:05
Subject: pgstats dead-space tracking
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-09-21 01:10:07
Subject: Re: Patch to update log levels

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group