Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-30 20:12:55
Message-ID: 20070830201255.GC23674@yellowbank.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
2007-08-30_15:52:58-0400 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> In summary, looking at possible conclusions to this discussion, I think
> we have:
> 
> 	1) No change
> 	2) Emphasize "Postgres" more as an alternative
> 	3) Change the name to "PostgresQL"
> 	4) Change the name to "Postgres QL"
> 	5) Change the name to "Postgres"

6) Change the official pronunciation to whatever most people find most
   comfortable, and forgive the rest.

...not all mututally exclusive options.

-- 
Ron Peterson
https://www.yellowbank.com/

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2007-08-30 20:13:13
Subject: Re: Informal pronunciation poll
Previous:From: Ron MayerDate: 2007-08-30 20:11:58
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group