| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Out of Memory - 8.2.4 |
| Date: | 2007-08-30 17:23:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20070830172348.GU5872@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm not having much luck really. I think the problem is that ANALYZE
> > stores reltuples as the number of live tuples, so if you delete a big
> > portion of a big table, then ANALYZE and then VACUUM, there's a huge
> > misestimation and extra index cleanup passes happen, which is a bad
> > thing.
>
> Yeah ... so just go with a constant estimate of say 200 deletable tuples
> per page?
This seems the most reasonable approach for now. So this is the patch.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
"I call it GNU/Linux. Except the GNU/ is silent." (Ben Reiter)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| maintworkmem-estimate-2.patch | text/x-diff | 2.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2007-08-30 17:28:19 | Re: PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-30 17:13:05 | Re: PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007 |