Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-28 15:15:23
Message-ID: 200708281115.23261.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 11:06, Dave Page wrote:
> Decibel! wrote:
> > I think we can just as easily make the change without any real fanfare
> > at all. 
> 
> I'm inclined to agree. For the most part we could all just slowly change
> things to 'Postgres'. I doubt anyone would really notice, except we'd
> get fewer people getting it wrong!

How about a vote? 

How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0' reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work involved out of the debate for the moment)?



Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2007-08-28 15:23:36
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-08-28 15:06:47
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group