Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-08-04 22:06:54
Message-ID: 200708042306550000@215491828 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www

> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> Sent: 04/08/07, 22:18:02
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
> 
> O.k. perhaps this is a perception problem. Consider my involvement in
> the community and the fact that I thought that I had to do all of the
> above in order to contribute to the site... Now take into account
> someone who isn't as involved as I?

People from all sorts of places mail their requests to webmaster@ from where they are actioned or pointed in the right direction.

This is fairly standard practice the world over, and works quite well - I even do it internally in EDB. In your case, I would expect you to mail the webteam (-www). I don't understand why this is difficult for you.

/D

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-08-04 23:54:16
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-08-04 21:59:47
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-08-04 23:54:16
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-08-04 21:59:47
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group