Re: stats_block_level

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: stats_block_level
Date: 2007-07-31 16:33:21
Message-ID: 20070731163321.GL5103@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I agree. Let's remove stats_start_collector and merge the other two
> > into a single setting. Anything more than that is overkill.
>
> So what are we going to call the one surviving GUC variable?

"collect_stats"

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-07-31 16:55:33 Re: stats_block_level
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-07-31 16:26:00 Re: stats_block_level