Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: stats_block_level

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: stats_block_level
Date: 2007-07-31 16:33:21
Message-ID: 20070731163321.GL5103@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I agree.  Let's remove stats_start_collector and merge the other two
> > into a single setting.  Anything more than that is overkill.
> 
> So what are we going to call the one surviving GUC variable?

"collect_stats"

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-07-31 16:55:33
Subject: Re: stats_block_level
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-07-31 16:26:00
Subject: Re: stats_block_level

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group