On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:32:11PM -0400, Steven Flatt wrote:
> weren't convinced was doing anything), then start a manual vacuum with a
> higher vacuum_cost_limit to get things cleaned up quicker.
What are your vacuum_cost_* settings? If you set those too aggressively
you'll be in big trouble.
The second pass on the vacuum means that maintenance_work_memory isn't
Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: andrew||Date: 2007-07-28 19:03:52|
|Subject: Re: Slow query with backwards index scan|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-07-28 14:37:07|
|Subject: Re: Vacuum looping? |