Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Any reason not to just fold them both into stats_start_collector ?
> > Well, then you couldn't turn collection on and off without restarting
> > the postmaster, which might be a pain.
> Maybe we don't actually need stats_start_collector, but instead we start
> it always and just have one knob to turn collection on and off. I'm
> not sure whether the extra process would bother people if they're not
> collecting, but we have so many extra processes now, why would anyone
I agree. Let's remove stats_start_collector and merge the other two
into a single setting. Anything more than that is overkill.
Having a single idle process is not a problem to anyone. It just sleeps
all the time. We are all used to having six useless getty processes and
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-07-27 08:42:00|
|Subject: Re: stats_block_level|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2007-07-27 08:15:28|
|Subject: Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes|