Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers

From: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Date: 2007-07-25 13:07:23
Message-ID: 200707251507.23951.mweilguni@sime.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-performance
Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> I have reasonable evidence that Referential Integrity is the major
> performance bottleneck and would like some objective evidence that this
> is the case.

Just curious, will 8.3 still check FK constraints (and use locks) even if the 
referencing column value does not change?

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Ansgar -59cobalt- WiechersDate: 2007-07-25 13:35:12
Subject: Re: index over timestamp not being used
Previous:From: Mario WeilguniDate: 2007-07-25 13:05:10
Subject: Re: index over timestamp not being used

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-07-25 13:41:14
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-07-25 12:58:31
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group