Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Date: 2007-07-24 00:24:23
Message-ID: 20070724002423.GJ2665@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > OK, 20ms it is then. Here is a patch. I am taking the liberty to also
> > lower the vacuum and analyze threshold default values to 50, per
> > previous discussion.
>
> Patch probably needs to touch docs (config.sgml at least) too?

That's right -- I was happy because I checked maintenance.sgml and
catalog.sgml and they didn't need any update, I forgot to check
config.sgml.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

Attachment Content-Type Size
autovac-params-2.patch text/x-diff 6.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-07-24 02:46:17 Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Previous Message Mark Wong 2007-07-24 00:04:48 Re: Why so many out-of-disk-space failures on buildfarm machines?