Re: Should we bump libpq major version for 8.3?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we bump libpq major version for 8.3?
Date: 2007-07-18 00:31:21
Message-ID: 200707180031.l6I0VLf03334@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > As of today there are two new functions exported by libpq.so since
> > 8.2 (lo_truncate and PQconnectionUsedPassword). Currently,
> > libpq/Makefile sets the major.minor shlib version to 5.1 as compared
> > to 5.0 in PG 8.2. Should it be 6.0? I seem to recall people
> > chastizing us for not bumping the major version if there were any
> > ABI changes at all, forward-compatible or not.
>
> No, it should be 5.1 (we havn't released a 5.1 at all yet, have we?).
> Adding functions is a minor shlib bump and should *not* change the
> SONAME (which includes the major here, objdump -p libpq.so.5.0).

Agreed. src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES says only a minor bump is needed, and
I already did that for 8.3. We are OK.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-18 00:40:36 Re: BUG #3431: age() gets the days wrong
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-07-18 00:19:44 Re: [HACKERS] msvc, build and install with cygwin in the PATH