Gregory Stark wrote:
> I can imagine a scenario where you have a system that's very busy for 60s and
> then idle for 60s repeatedly. And for some reason you configure a
> checkpoint_timeout on the order of 20m or so (assuming you're travelling
> precisely 60mph).
Is that Scottish m?
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-06-27 03:11:17|
|Subject: Re: psql: add volatility to \df+ |
|Previous:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2007-06-26 22:40:28|
|Subject: Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3|