| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karl Wright <kwright(at)metacarta(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access |
| Date: | 2007-06-20 17:53:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20070620175300.GN30369@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Karl Wright wrote:
> (b) the performance of individual queries had already degraded
> significantly in the same manner as what I'd seen before.
You didn't answer whether you had smaller, more frequently updated
tables that need more vacuuming. This comment makes me think you do. I
think what you should be looking at is whether you can forget vacuuming
the whole database in one go, and make it more granular.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"Having your biases confirmed independently is how scientific progress is
made, and hence made our great society what it is today" (Mary Gardiner)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2007-06-20 17:53:07 | Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-06-20 17:40:37 | Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access |