In response to "Sabin Coanda" <sabin(dot)coanda(at)deuromedia(dot)ro>:
> Hi there,
> Using explicitly VACUUM command give me the opportunity to fine tune my
> VACUUM scheduling parameters, after I analyze the log generated by VACUUM
> On the other hand I'd like to use the auto-vacuum mechanism because of its
> facilities. Unfortunately, after I made some initial estimations for
> autovacuum_naptime, and I set the specific data into pg_autovacuum table, I
> have not a feedback from the auto-vacuum mechanism to check that it works
> well or not. It would be nice to have some kind of log similar with the one
> generated by VACUUM VERBOSE. Is the auto-vacuum mechanism able to provide
> such a useful log ?
Ditto what Alvaro said.
However, you can get some measure of tracking my running VACUUM VERBOSE
on a regular basis to see how well autovacuum is keeping up. There's
no problem with running manual vacuum and autovacuum together, and you'll
be able to gather _some_ information about how well autovacuum is
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Sabin Coanda||Date: 2007-06-12 16:42:10|
|Subject: Re: VACUUM vs auto-vacuum daemon|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-06-12 16:09:46|
|Subject: Re: test / live environment, major performance difference |